...
首页> 外文期刊>Telecom A.M >LEVEL 3 SEEKS RULING AGAINST USE OF CLECS FOR FEE-PADDING
【24h】

LEVEL 3 SEEKS RULING AGAINST USE OF CLECS FOR FEE-PADDING

机译:关于使用Clecs进行收费的第3层裁决

获取原文

摘要

Level 3 asked the FCC to prohibit wireless carriers' use of "inserted" competitive local exchange carriers to collect access fees that they couldn't get otherwise from long distance carriers. "Five years ago ... the Commission made clear that CMRS carriers and the CLECs they selected could not work together to obtain access payments that exceeded the competing ILEC's interstate rates for portions of a wireless originated call handled by the CLEC," Level 3 said. "The Commission was clear that when a CLEC is providing access (i.e. transit) services at the behest of the CMRS carrier, the CLEC cannot use its ability to tariff access charges to charge for functions performed by the CMRS carrier and not by the CLEC." Despite the order, the company said, "Level 3 continues to be presented with demands by some CLECs ... to pay access charges that far exceed the federal access rates that the ILEC would levy for performing the same functions for wireless-originated toll-free traffic."
机译:级别3要求FCC禁止无线运营商使用“插入式”竞争性本地交换运营商来收取长途运营商无法获得的接入费。 “ 5年前……委员会明确指出,对于由CLEC处理的一部分无线始发呼叫,CMRS运营商和他们选择的CLEC无法共同获得超出竞争性ILEC州际速率的接入费用。” 。 “委员会很清楚,当CLEC按照CMRS运营商的要求提供接入(即中转)服务时,CLEC不能使用其对接入费进行收费的能力来为CMRS运营商而非CLEC所执行的功能收费。 ”该公司表示,尽管有此命令,“某些CLEC仍然要求3级服务……支付的访问费用远远超过ILEC为执行无线起源的长途电话收费功能而收取的联邦访问费。免费流量。”

著录项

  • 来源
    《Telecom A.M 》 |2009年第92期| P.1-1| 共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号