...
首页> 外文期刊>Telecom A.M >Debate Weighs Broadband Access Reclassification Pros and Cons
【24h】

Debate Weighs Broadband Access Reclassification Pros and Cons

机译:辩论权衡宽带接入的分类优缺点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Title II reclassification would put the FCC on a firmer legal footing, said some participants in a net neutrality debate at the Broadband Policy Summit. Others said it could scare away investors and lead to price regulation. "The overall legal framework" in the net neutrality "notice of proposed rulemaking is so bad," said Phoenix Center President Lawrence Spiwak. It violates Sections 201 and 202 of the Communications Act and "it is by definition price regulation," he said. If FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski says the goal is investment and broadband deployment, and "if people perceive that there is going to be that kind of risk, capital will be very difficult to come by," Spiwak said. There must be rule of law, said Verizon Senior Vice President Kathryn Brown. But "we shouldn’t micro-manage this whole process" and oversight should be flexible, she said. Congress should step in and "say what is the new statutory framework for us moving forward."
机译:宽带政策峰会上的网络中立性辩论的一些参与者表示,对标题II的重新分类将使FCC的法律地位更加牢固。其他人则表示,这可能会吓跑投资者并导致价格监管。凤凰中心主席劳伦斯·斯皮瓦克(Lawrence Spiwak)说,网络中立性的“整体法律框架”非常糟糕。他说,这违反了《通讯法》第201条和第202条,并且“按定义是价格法规”。斯皮瓦克说,如果FCC主席朱利叶斯·杰纳科夫斯基(Julius Genachowski)表示目标是投资和宽带部署,并且“如果人们意识到会有这种风险,那么资金将很难获得。” Verizon高级副总裁Kathryn Brown说,必须有法治。她说,但是“我们不应该对整个过程进行微观管理”,监督应该灵活。国会应介入并“说出前进的新法定框架是什么”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Telecom A.M》 |2010年第113期|P.00000001-00000001|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号