首页> 外文期刊>Telecom A.M >PAEs and IP Groups Urge Narrower FTC Patent Assertion Study
【24h】

PAEs and IP Groups Urge Narrower FTC Patent Assertion Study

机译:PAE和IP团体敦促进行更窄的FTC专利断言研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The scope of the FTC’s proposed study of patent assertion entities is “far broader than necessaryrnto serve the proper performance of the functions of the FTC,” said InterDigital in a filing to the FTC releasedrnWednesday (http://1.usa.gov/1ho7tkd). The FTC voted in September to begin exploring a proposed PAE study, which it would launch using its authority under Section 6(b) of the FTC Act (CD Septrn30 p15). InterDigital said it doesn't believe it's a PAE as the FTC defined it in its study proposal, thoughrnmany of the company’s critics have defined it as one. The FTC defined PAEs as “firms with a businessrnmodel based primarily on purchasing patents and then attempting to generate revenue" by asserting theirrnintellectual property rights "against persons who are already practicing the patented technologies.” Intellectualrnproperty groups and other companies often defined as PAEs also expressed significant concernsrnwith the proposed study.
机译:InterDigital在周三发布给FTC的文件中表示,FTC提议的专利主张实体研究的范围“远远超出了为FTC的正常履行服务所必需的范围。”(http://1.usa.gov/1ho7tkd )。 FTC在9月份投票决定开始探索一项拟议的PAE研究,该研究将根据FTC法案(CD Septrn30 p15)第6(b)节的授权使用。 InterDigital表示,它不认为这是FTC在研究提案中定义的PAE,尽管该公司的许多批评家都将其定义为PAE。 FTC将PAE定义为“主要通过购买专利然后尝试创收的商业模式进行确认的公司”,方法是宣称其知识产权“针对已经在使用专利技术的人”。知识产权组织和通常被定义为PAE的其他公司也对拟议的研究表示了极大的关注。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Telecom A.M》 |2013年第245期|8-11|共4页
  • 作者

    Jimm Phillips;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号