...
【24h】

Wireless

机译:无线

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

CTIA urged the FCC to reject a petition for reconsideration filed in July by the American Associationnfor Justice (AAJ) objecting to the FCC’s reclassification of the outer ear as not subject to specific absorptionnrate limits for radiation from cellphones (http://fcc.us/13SvTNS) under the agency's radio frequencynrules. “Unlike the Trial Lawyers, CTIA strongly supports the Commission’s decision in the Firstn[report and order] to classify the pinna as an extremity based on the expert determinations of the [Foodnand Drug Administration] and of the IEEE, and the Commission’s conclusion that this specification has nonpractical effect on human exposure to RF energy permitted by the FCC’s rules,” CTIA said (http:/bit.ly/19M0u0o). “Because the Commission’s inclusion of the pinna with the ankles, wrists, feet, andnhands for purposes of RF [radio frequency] exposure compliance was properly guided by the recommendationsnof federal agencies and organizations with expertise in measuring RF exposure and evaluating itsnenvironmental effects,” CTIA said the FCC should reject AAJ's petition.
机译:CTIA敦促FCC拒绝美国司法协会(AAJ)在7月份提交的重新审议请愿书,该申请反对FCC将外耳重新分类为不受手机辐射的特定吸收率限制(http://fcc.us/ 13SvTNS)在该机构的无线电频率规则下。 “与审判律师不同,CTIA强烈支持委员会在Firstn [报告和命令]中做出的决定,即根据[Foodnand Drug Administration]和IEEE的专家决定将品纳分类为极端,并且委员会得出结论认为,该规范对FCC规则允许的人体暴露于RF能量没有实际影响。” CTIA表示(http:/bit.ly/19M0u0o)。 “由于委员会在射频(RF)暴露符合性方面将皮纳与踝,腕,脚和手一起包括在内,是由联邦机构和组织在测量射频暴露和评估其环境影响方面具有专门知识的建议正确指导的。”称FCC应该拒绝AJ的请愿书。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Telecom A.M.》 |2013年第178期|19-19|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号