...
首页> 外文期刊>Telecom A.M. >International Telecom
【24h】

International Telecom

机译:国际电信

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The U.K.'s "expansive spying regime" appears to operate outside the law, isn't accountable and isnneither necessary nor proportionate, Privacy International (PI) said Monday in a claim filed in the InvestigatorynPowers Tribunal (http://bit.ly/15r7MWK). The action challenges the government on two fronts, PInsaid: (1) Failure to have a publicly accessible legal framework in which communications data of thosenlocated in the U.K. are accessed after being obtained and passed on by the National Security Agencynthrough Prism. (2) The “indiscriminate interception” and storing of huge amounts of data by tapping underseanfiber cables through the Tempora program. It's reported that the U.K. has had access to Prism sincenat least June 2010, and generated 197 intelligence reports from the system in 2012, PI said. Without a legalnframework that lets citizens know the circumstances in which such spying takes place, the governmentn“effectively runs a secret surveillance regime, making it nearly impossible to hold them accountable fornany potential abuses,” it said. That appears to breach the European Convention on Human Rights, whichnsafeguards the rights to privacy, personal communications and freedom of expression, it said. PI intendednto file the Prism case in the Administrative Court, which would have made it public, but after governmentnobjections, filed in the tribunal, whose proceedings aren't public, the organization said. The GovernmentnCommunications Headquarters, which is taking the lead on the case, said it doesn't comment on intelligencenmatters.
机译:国际私隐组织(PI)周一在InvestigatorynPowers法庭(http://bit.ly/)提出的一项要求中说,英国的“扩张性间谍制度”似乎在法律之外运作,不负责任,既无必要,也不成比例。 15r7MWK)。这项行动在两个方面对政府提出了挑战:(1)未能建立可公开访问的法律框架,在该框架中,由国家安全局(National Security Agency)通过Prism获取并传递了位于英国的通信数据。 (2)通过Tempora程序通过窃听下层光纤电缆,进行“不加区别的拦截”和存储大量数据。据报道,据报道,英国至少从2010年6月起就可以使用Prism,并在2012年从该系统生成了197份情报报告。它说,如果没有使公民了解这种间谍活动发生情况的法律框架,政府将“有效地实行秘密监视制度,几乎不可能追究他们对潜在的虐待行为的责任”。它说,这似乎违反了《欧洲人权公约》,后者保障了隐私权,个人通讯权和言论自由权。该组织说,PI打算向行政法院提起Prism案,该案本应公开,但在政府提出异议后,法庭未公开其诉讼程序。牵头处理此案的政府通讯总部说,它没有对情报问题发表评论。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Telecom A.M.》 |2013年第131期|13-13|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号