首页> 外文期刊>Technology in society >Technology, choice and the good life: Questioning technological liberalism
【24h】

Technology, choice and the good life: Questioning technological liberalism

机译:技术,选择与美好生活:质疑技术自由主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Technologies should be recognized as impacting personal choice concerning the good life. Yet, technological liberalism - the idea that technology permits an extending of individual volition concerning the good without distortion - remains a dominant collective belief. It is not enough to recognize that technologies can serve as "radical monopolies" or "script" human action. They also influence human action and choice in terms of cognition and affect. Technologies-of-choice can be viewed as enabling the belief that one may act as an unencumbered self, even though they do not unequivocally extend the human will. Consideration of the impact of technologies on human volition suggests possible avenues of research into when and how technologically reflexive decision making may actually occur as well as how societies could create space for technologies more compatible with alternative notions of the good, such as that exemplified in the philosophy of Albert Borgmann. Yet, the task of enabling a wider deployment of more focal or communitarian kinds of technology is far from straightforward.
机译:技术应该被认为会影响个人对美好生活的选择。但是,技术自由主义(即技术允许在不扭曲的情况下扩大涉及商品的个人意志的观念)仍然是一种占主导地位的集体信念。仅仅承认技术可以充当“激进垄断”或“脚本”人类行为还远远不够。它们还从认知和影响方面影响人类的行动和选择。选择技术可以被视为使人们相信,即使它们不会明确地扩大人的意志,人们也可以充当不受约束的自我。考虑技术对人类意志的影响,提出了可能在何时何地进行技术上反省性决策的研究,以及社会如何为与替代品概念更兼容的技术创造空间创造了空间,例如:阿尔伯特·博格曼的哲学。但是,实现更广泛地部署更多焦点性或共产主义技术的任务远非易事。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号