首页> 外文期刊>Technology in society >Risk society without reflexive modernization? The case from northwestern Michigan
【24h】

Risk society without reflexive modernization? The case from northwestern Michigan

机译:在没有反身现代化的情况下冒社会风险吗?来自密歇根州西北部的案件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Energy infrastructure projects have long been the source of public controversy, whether for economic, environmental, or social reasons. In this paper I examine the controversy surrounding the construction of a wind turbine park near [Aldington, in the northwestern part of the US. state of Michigan from the perspectives of Beck's 'risk society' thesis and the associated concept of 'reflexive modernization'. Although many energy projects have been evaluated in such terms, the theories are traditionally presented as a single block. In this paper I re-consider the fusion of risk society and reflexive modernization through the analysis of resistance to the wind farm project outlined above. Following Beck et al.'s guidelines, I 'test' for the presence of reflexive modernization, analyzing the case study through a discourse analysis. I determine that while evidence of the 'risk society' thesis abounds, it is not entirely clear that 'reflexive modernization' is occurring. This is due, superficially, to differences in the involved parties' interests in actually changing (and being open to changing) their ontologies, policies, and procedures in response to critique; and, more fundamentally, to the inherent indeterminability of knowledge, or the realpo-litik that conflict between competing claims to knowledge can never be resolved to all parties' satisfaction. To that end, 1 call for the re-isolation of the risk society and reflexive modernization concepts in relation to energy and other infrastructure projects.
机译:长期以来,无论是出于经济,环境还是社会原因,能源基础设施项目一直是引起公众争议的根源。在本文中,我研究了围绕[美国西北部的奥尔丁顿附近的]风力涡轮机公园建设的争议。从贝克的“风险社会”论点和相关的“反身现代化”的概念来看密歇根州。尽管已经对许多能源项目进行了评估,但是这些理论传统上是作为一个整体展示的。在本文中,我通过分析上述对风电场项目的抵制,重新考虑了风险社会与反思性现代化的融合。遵循Beck等人的指南,我“测试”反思性现代化的存在,通过话语分析来分析案例研究。我确定,尽管“风险社会”论点的证据很多,但还不清楚“反身现代化”的发生。从表面上讲,这是由于参与方在响应批评而实际改变(并愿意改变)其本体,政策和程序方面的利益差异;而且,从根本上来说,这是知识的固有不确定性,或者是对知识的相互竞争的主张之间的冲突永远无法解决的各方满意的现实-事实。为此,1呼吁重新隔离与能源和其他基础设施项目有关的风险社会和反思性现代化概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号