首页> 外文期刊>Technology in society >Honest but broke: The dilemma of universities acting as honest brokers
【24h】

Honest but broke: The dilemma of universities acting as honest brokers

机译:诚实但失败:大学扮演诚实经纪人的困境

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Universities and government research organizations (GROs) are increasingly being thrust into the role of an honest broker. They gather scientific data on technical, social and economic issues and present potential policies and courses of action to interested parties. However, they must remain unbiased at all times, whilst offering expertise in a wide range of subjects, especially in areas concerning controversial technologies. In this article we argue that today's science funding paradigms make universities and GROs increasingly vulnerable in their role as honest brokers in society. We exemplify our arguments with a descriptive case study surrounding Swiss nuclear energy research, which offers insights into past and current funding strategies. Dedicated funding strategies, such as funding professorships or technology platforms that allow honest brokers to safeguard their integrity and conduct research in controversial areas are presented and discussed.
机译:大学和政府研究组织(GRO)越来越多地扮演诚实经纪人的角色。他们收集有关技术,社会和经济问题的科学数据,并向有关方面介绍潜在的政策和行动方针。但是,他们必须始终保持公正,同时提供广泛主题的专业知识,尤其是在有争议的技术领域。在本文中,我们认为,当今的科学资助范例使大学和GRO作为社会诚信经纪人的角色越来越脆弱。我们通过围绕瑞士核能研究的描述性案例研究来举例说明我们的论点,该案例研究提供了对过去和当前融资策略的见识。提出并讨论了专门的筹资策略,例如资助教授职位或技术平台,以允许诚实的经纪人维护自己的诚信并在有争议的领域进行研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号