...
首页> 外文期刊>Systems & Network Management Journal >Are There More Cost-effective Solutions For SMBs Than File Servers?
【24h】

Are There More Cost-effective Solutions For SMBs Than File Servers?

机译:是否有比文件服务器更适合中小企业的高性价比解决方案?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this time of economic uncertainty, small and medium businesses (SMBs) have been asked to do more with less, and the pressure, in what is increasingly looking to be a double-dip recession, is mounting. Yet, 57 percent of IT managers at small and medium businesses (SMBs) underestimate the cost of owning a traditional file server, according to a study. Additionally, 41 percent of U.S. information workers were using various unapproved online file storage and data services for work purposes. When estimating annual file server costs, over one-half of the respondents initially reported costs of under $5,000 per year, while 12 percent reported over $20,000 per year. But when asked to think about the costs again in a more itemized fashion, including costs like software, administration, file server OS and licenses, the majority of SMBs, 57 percent, increased their total cost estimate. Nineteen percent did so by more than $25,000, with the number of companies estimating costs at more than $20,000 a year almost tripling. These findings suggest that it won't be long before the true value and cost savings of a pure cloud or hybrid cloud approach will lead to the demise of the traditional file server.
机译:在当前经济充满不确定性的时代,中小企业被要求事半功倍,而越来越多的人认为是双底衰退的压力越来越大。然而,一项研究显示,中小企业(SMB)的IT经理中有57%的人低估了拥有传统文件服务器的成本。此外,有41%的美国信息工作者出于工作目的而使用各种未经批准的在线文件存储和数据服务。在估算年度文件服务器成本时,超过一半的受访者最初报告的年度成本低于5,000美元,而12%的受访者表示的年度成本超过20,000美元。但是当被要求以更详细的方式再次考虑成本时,包括软件,管理,文件服务器操作系统和许可证等成本,大多数中小企业(占57%)增加了总成本估算。 19%的公司这样做的费用超过了25,000美元,估计每年费用超过20,000美元的公司数量几乎增长了两倍。这些发现表明,不久之后,纯云或混合云方法的真正价值和成本节省将导致传统文件服务器的消亡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号