首页> 外文期刊>Synthese >From geometry to phenomenology
【24h】

From geometry to phenomenology

机译:从几何学到现象学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Richard Tieszen [Tieszen, R. (2005). Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LXX(1), 153–173.] has argued that the group-theoretical approach to modern geometry can be seen as a realization of Edmund Husserl’s view of eidetic intuition. In support of Tieszen’s claim, the present article discusses Husserl’s approach to geometry in 1886–1902. Husserl’s first detailed discussion of the concept of group and invariants under transformations takes place in his notes on Hilbert’s Memoir Ueber die Grundlagen der Geometrie that Hilbert wrote during the winter 1901–1902. Husserl’s interest in the Memoir is a continuation of his long-standing concern about analytic geometry and in particular Riemann and Helmholtz’s approach to geometry. Husserl favored a non-metrical approach to geometry; thus the topological nature of Hilbert’s Memoir must have been intriguing to him. The task of phenomenology is to describe the givenness of this logos, hence Husserl needed to develop the notion of eidetic intuition.
机译:理查德·铁森[Tieszen,R.(2005)。哲学和现象学研究,LXX(1),153–173。]认为,现代几何学的群体理论方法可以看作是埃德蒙·胡塞尔(Edmund Husserl)的直觉观的实现。为了支持蒂森的主张,本文讨论了胡塞尔在1886年至1902年之间的几何方法。胡塞尔对变换下的群和不变量的概念的首次详细讨论发生在希尔伯特在1901–1902年冬季撰写的关于希尔伯特的回忆录《回忆录》的笔记中。胡塞尔对《回忆录》的兴趣是他长期以来对解析几何尤其是里曼和亥姆霍兹的几何方法的关注的延续。胡塞尔赞成采用非公制的几何方法。因此希尔伯特的回忆录的拓扑性质一定令他着迷。现象学的任务是描述该徽标的确定性,因此,胡塞尔需要发展道德直觉的概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号