首页> 外文期刊>Studies in history and philosophy of science >Hermeneutical contributions to the history of science: Gadamer on 'presentism'
【24h】

Hermeneutical contributions to the history of science: Gadamer on 'presentism'

机译:科学史的解释学贡献:伽达默尔对“存在主义”的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article examines how Hans G. Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics can contribute to contemporary debates on the concept of 'presentism'. In the field of the history of science, this term is usually employed in two ways. First, 'presentism' refers to the kind of historiography which judges the past to legitimate the present. Second, this concept designates the inevitable influence of the present in the interpretation of the past. In this paper, I argue that both dimensions of the relationship between the present and the past are explored by Hans G. Gadamer in Truth and Method and other texts. In the first place, Gadamer's critique of historicism calls into question the anti-presentist ideal of studying the past for 'its own sake'. In the second place, Gadamer's thesis that all understanding inevitably involves some prejudice poses the question of the inherent "present-centredness" of historical interpretations. By examining Gadamer's hermeneutics, I seek to provide historians with new arguments and perspectives on the question of 'presentism'.
机译:本文探讨了汉斯·加达默尔的哲学解释学如何为当代关于“表现主义”概念的辩论做出贡献。在科学历史领域,通常以两种方式使用该术语。首先,“当下主义”是指一种史学,它判断过去使当下合法。第二,这个概念在对过去的解释中指明了现在的必然影响。在本文中,我认为汉斯·加达默尔(Hans G. Gadamer)在《真理与方法》等书中探讨了现在与过去之间关系的两个维度。首先,伽达默尔对历史主义的批判使人们质疑出于“自己的利益”研究过去的反代表主义理想。其次,加达默尔的论点是所有理解都不可避免地涉及一些偏见,这提出了历史解释固有的“以现在为中心”的问题。通过考察加达默尔的诠释学,我试图为历史学家提供关于“表现主义”问题的新论据和观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号