首页> 外文期刊>Studies in East European Thought >Hegel at the GAKhN: between idealism and Marxism—on the aesthetic debates in Russia in the 1920s
【24h】

Hegel at the GAKhN: between idealism and Marxism—on the aesthetic debates in Russia in the 1920s

机译:黑格尔参加GAKhN:在唯心主义和马克思主义之间—关于1920年代俄罗斯的美学辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This contribution analyses the importance of the State Academy of the Study of Arts (GAKhN) in the appropriation of Hegel's aesthetics in Russia. In immediate connection to this discussion at the GAKhN is Gustav Špet’s conception of the ontology of art. This concept represents an attempt of a non-metaphysical interpretation of Hegel’s aesthetics. There, art is interpreted as an autonomous mode of the cultural existence as “aesthetic reality.” In this interpretation of art Špet refers to two of Hegel's theses in which (1) art is determined as “appearance” which stands as a "quasi-reality" and (2) the aesthetic object gets its ontological status because of “recognition” by humans. These theses help Špet to develop an alternative to Marxist aesthetics.
机译:这篇文章分析了国家艺术研究院(GAKhN)在挪用黑格尔美学方面的重要性。与GAKhN上的讨论直接相关的是古斯塔夫·史佩(GustavŠpet)对艺术本体论的构想。这个概念代表了对黑格尔美学的非形而上学解释的尝试。在那里,艺术被解释为文化存在的一种自主模式,即“审美现实”。在对艺术的这种解释中,Špet指的是黑格尔的两篇论文,其中(1)将艺术确定为“外观”,即“准现实”,(2)审美客体由于其“承认”而获得了本体论地位。人类。这些论点帮助Špet开发了马克思主义美学的替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号