首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID) >Global Capitalism and the Transformation of State Socialism
【24h】

Global Capitalism and the Transformation of State Socialism

机译:全球资本主义与国家社会主义的转变

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Abstract The article outlines the footprint of international economic interests under state socialism, and considers in more detail the economic integration of the postcommunist countries into the world system in the post-1989 period of the building of capitalism. The focus of the article is on the extent of economic globalization of countries and their economic corporations. It is contended that the globalization of capitalist companies and the direct role of global economic forces had little importance under state socialism. Since 1989, policy in the former state socialist countries has been geared to “joining” the world system, optimistically its core. Important differences have developed between the postsocialist states with respect to economic penetration and exposure to the world market. The outcomes have not fulfilled the expectations of early advocates of transformation and entry to the world economy. Although the new member states of the European Union have entered the world economy as formal members of the “core,” they are not economically equal to the dominant “old” members of the EU. In all the postcommunist countries, there is an absence of large scale global companies, of comparable levels of innovation, research and development. Russia is a resources rich country, a “hybrid” social formation containing elements of state economic control, national capitalism, and global capitalism. I conclude that the semi periphery is not a transient category in the world economy; it has potential for persistence and renewal.
机译:摘要文章概述了国家社会主义制度下国际经济利益的足迹,并更详细地考虑了后共产主义国家在1989年后的资本主义建设时期经济融入世界体系的情况。本文的重点是国家及其经济公司的经济全球化程度。有人认为,在国家社会主义制度下,资本主义公司的全球化和全球经济力量的直接作用并不重要。自1989年以来,前国家社会主义国家的政策旨在“乐观地”加入世界体系的核心。后社会主义国家之间在经济渗透率和接触世界市场方面已形成重要差异。结果并未达到转型和进入世界经济的早期倡导者的期望。尽管欧洲联盟的新成员国已作为“核心”的正式成员进入世界经济,但它们在经济上并不等同于欧盟的主要“老”成员。在所有后共产主义国家中,都没有大型的全球性公司,它们的创新,研究和开发水平不相上下。俄罗斯是一个资源丰富的国家,是一个包含国家经济控制,国家资本主义和全球资本主义元素的“混合”社会形态。我得出的结论是,半边际并不是世界经济中的过渡类别。它具有持久性和更新性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号