首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Comparative International Development >The Politics of Environmental Licensing: Energy Projects of the Past and Future in Brazil
【24h】

The Politics of Environmental Licensing: Energy Projects of the Past and Future in Brazil

机译:环境许可政治:巴西过去和未来的能源项目

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

How do societies make complex choices about concrete energy alternatives? Can citizens play effective roles in balancing risks and benefits? This article proposes that energy choices can be best understood as the result of a balance of power between state-society coalitions that aim to either block or enable the project. Environmental licensing and financing decisions are two decision points where the coalitions face off—and where energy projects go forward or are stopped. The article demonstrates that environmental licensing has become an unexpectedly stringent process in Brazil, with both formal opportunities and historic practices increasing the influence of blocking coalitions. Yet case studies of the Belo Monte hydroelectric dam and massive new petroleum reserves in the “pre-salt” region show that blocking coalitions emerge inconsistently in the same institutional context, illustrating the hazards of relying on public mobilization for addressing certain kinds of risk situations. An “anticipatory state” may also pre-empt mobilization by proactively responding to the concerns blocking coalitions are likely to raise.
机译:社会如何对混凝土能源替代方案做出复杂的选择?公民能否在平衡风险和利益方面发挥有效作用?本文提出,对能源的选择可以最好地理解,这是旨在阻止或启用该项目的国家—社会联盟之间力量平衡的结果。环境许可和融资决策是联盟对抗的两个决策点,也是能源项目前进或停止的两个决策点。文章证明,在巴西,环境许可已成为一个出乎意料的严格程序,正式的机会和历史性做法都增加了阻止联盟的影响。但是,对“盐下”地区贝洛蒙(Belo Monte)水电大坝和大量新的石油储备的案例研究表明,在同一制度背景下出现的阻塞性联盟不一致,说明了依靠公众动员来解决某些风险情况的危害。一个“预期国家”也可以通过积极响应阻止联盟可能引起的担忧,来阻止动员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号