首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Comparative International Development >State Power and the Economic Origins of Democracy
【24h】

State Power and the Economic Origins of Democracy

机译:国家权力与民主的经济渊源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recent comparative politics scholarship on regime change has not taken state capacity seriously. Prominent works on the relationship between democracy and economic inequality center on the expectation by economic elites that democratization will lead to economic redistribution. But state capacity is necessary for redistribution, and where extractive capacity is lacking, rational economic elites should not fear that suffrage expansion would lead to effective redistribution, nor should the masses expect to gain economically from democratization. State capacity thus acts as a scope condition for the effect of inequality on regime outcomes. This prediction is confirmed through replication and extension of the analysis in Boix (2003), with the addition of the presence of a regularly implemented national census as a proxy for state capacity. In strong states, the effect of inequality on regime change is confirmed. But where the state is weak, inequality is shown to have no effect on regime outcomes. Thus, including state capacity in theories of regime change calls into question general claims about the “economic origins” of dictatorship and democracy.
机译:最近关于政权更替的比较政治学研究并没有认真对待国家能力。关于民主与经济不平等之间关系的杰出著作集中在经济精英们对民主化将导致经济再分配的期望之上。但是国家能力对于再分配是必要的,在缺乏开采能力的情况下,理性的经济精英们不应该担心选举权的扩大会导致有效的再分配,群众也不应期望从民主化中获得经济利益。因此,国家能力是不平等对政权结果影响的范围条件。通过复制和扩展Boix(2003)中的分析,并以定期进行的国家人口普查作为国家能力的代名词,证实了这一预测。在强国中,不平等对政权更迭的影响得到了证实。但是,在状态薄弱的地方,不平等现象对政权结果没有影响。因此,将国家能力包含在政权更替理论中,使人们对有关独裁和民主的“经济起源”的一般主张提出质疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号