首页> 外文期刊>Studies in Comparative International Development >Category and Kin in “Crisis”: Representations of Kinship, Care, and Vulnerability in Demographic and Ethnographic Research in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
【24h】

Category and Kin in “Crisis”: Representations of Kinship, Care, and Vulnerability in Demographic and Ethnographic Research in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

机译:“危机”中的类别和亲属:南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省的人口学和人种学研究中的亲属关系,照护和脆弱性表示

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Drawing together 10 years of surveillance data on and material gathered through ethnographic engagements with a small group of 20 young people and families, the article interrogates tensions and complementarities in the ways in which divergent research modalities come to represent kinship, family life, and changing forms of child vulnerability over time. The article begins by drawing out some of the tensions between demographic and ethnographic modes of inquiry, exploring the divergent objects and values of each. The focus then shifts from these broader epistemological debates to explore the life of a selected “case” as it unfolds within both a demographic database and through ethnographic research in one locality in South Africa. To resolve the tensions between these perspectives, the article concludes that we must move beyond a focus on empirical divergences between forms of research representation. Rather, we must develop more rigorous methodologies for critical, comparative, “multi-sited” analyses of forms of experience and local-life worlds. Understanding the divergent insights that can be gained through different modes of inquiry, and the ways in which they shape and are shaped by everyday experiences in locality, is essential to coming to terms with contemporary forms of governance and everyday life.
机译:通过与20个年轻人和家庭组成的小组进行民族志研究,收集了10年的监视数据并收集了资料,本文以各种研究方式代表亲戚,家庭生活和形式变化的方式审视了紧张局势和互补性随着时间的流逝儿童的脆弱性。本文首先阐述了人口统计学和民族志研究模式之间的一些张力,探讨了每种方法的不同对象和价值。然后,重点从这些更广泛的认识论辩论转移到探讨选定“案例”的生命,因为该案例在人口统计数据库中以及在南非一个地区的人种学研究中均不断发展。为了解决这些观点之间的矛盾,本文得出结论,我们必须超越对研究代表形式之间的经验差异的关注。相反,我们必须开发更严格的方法,以对经验形式和当地生活世界进行批判性,比较性,“多地点”分析。了解如何通过不同的调查模式获得不同的见解,以及它们在当地的日常经验中形成和形成的方式,对于适应当代的治理形式和日常生活至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号