首页> 外文期刊>Structural equation modeling >Multiple-Group Invariance with Categorical Outcomes Using Updated Guidelines: An Illustration Using Mplus and the lavaan/semTools Packages
【24h】

Multiple-Group Invariance with Categorical Outcomes Using Updated Guidelines: An Illustration Using Mplus and the lavaan/semTools Packages

机译:使用更新的指南与分类结果的多组不变性:使用Mplus和Lavaan / Semtools软件包的插图

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Meaningful comparisons of means or relationships between latent constructs across groups require evidence that measurement is equivalent across the studied groups- a property known as measurement equivalence or invariance (ME/I). Methods typically involve an evaluation of increasingly stringent models via confirmatory factor analysis, a typical assumption of which is continuous observed variables. When that assumption is not met - as is often the case in many surveys - alternative methods that directly model the categorical nature of the data exist. Although well established, categorical ME/I models pose a number of complexities and various recommendations for their evaluation. To that end, we describe the current state of categorical ME/I and demonstrate an up-to-date method for model identification and invariance testing. In the tutorial, we exemplify a common approach to establishing ME/I via multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis using Mplus and the lavaan and semTools packages in R.
机译:跨组的潜在构建体之间的有意义的比较或关系需要证据,即在研究的群体中测量等同于称为测量等价或不变性(ME / I)的属性。方法通常涉及通过确认因子分析评估越来越严格的模型,其典型假设是连续观察的变量。当不符合该假设时 - 通常情况下,许多调查中的情况 - 替代方法直接模拟存在数据的分类性质。虽然成立了,分类我/我模型为他们的评估构成了许多复杂性和各种建议。为此,我们描述了当前的分类ME / I状态,并展示了模型识别和不变性测试的最新方法。在教程中,我们举例说明了使用Mplus和Lavaan和Remtools包在R的多组确认因子分析来建立ME / I的常见方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号