首页> 外文期刊>Structural concrete >A comparative study between ASTM C1567 and ASTM C227 to mitigate alkali-silica reaction
【24h】

A comparative study between ASTM C1567 and ASTM C227 to mitigate alkali-silica reaction

机译:ASTM C1567与ASTM C227缓解碱硅反应的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the two different widely adopted test methods such as american society for testing and materials (ASTM) C1567 accelerated mortar bar method and ASTM C227 mortar bar method to identify the alkali-silica reaction (ASR) of ferronickel slag fine aggregates. The ASR mitigation measure was assessed by the application of supplementary cementing material such as fly ash. During the experimental investigation visual inspection, mortar bar expansion and tensile strength measurements were evaluated. The test results point out that mortar bar method was unsuccessful to identify the ASR due to significant alkali leaching during the experiment. On the other hand, accelerated mortar bar method was successful to identify ASR and able to determine the safe dosage of fly ash to mitigate this deleterious expansion.
机译:这项研究的主要目的是评估两种广泛采用的测试方法,例如美国材料测试学会(ASTM)C1567加速砂浆棒法和ASTM C227砂浆棒法,以鉴定镍铁的碱-硅反应(ASR)。炉渣细骨料。缓解ASR的措施是通过使用粉煤灰等辅助胶结材料进行评估的。在实验研究的目视检查过程中,评估了灰浆棒的膨胀和抗张强度的测量结果。测试结果指出,由于在实验过程中大量的碱浸出,灰浆棒法未能成功识别ASR。另一方面,加速砂浆棒法成功地鉴定了ASR,并能够确定粉煤灰的安全剂量以减轻这种有害的膨胀。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号