首页> 外文期刊>Strategic Management Journal >The nanoeconomics of firm-level decision-making and industry evolution: Evidence from 200 years of paper and pulp making
【24h】

The nanoeconomics of firm-level decision-making and industry evolution: Evidence from 200 years of paper and pulp making

机译:企业级决策和产业演进的纳米经济学:来自200多年造纸业的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Research Summary We explore the qualitative differences in entries and exits over time. Using qualitative and quantitative data on 96 firms over 200 years, we study industry evolution from the perspective of individual decision-making situations. Our historical and statistical analyses reveal the vital role of technology investments in determining firm outcomes, and the technological, institutional and governance dynamics that lead firms to invest or to abstain. Our main theoretical and methodological contribution concerns the importance of the multiplicity of firm-level rationalities and decisions as fundamentals in theorizing on industry evolution. Managerial Summary What determines firm outcomes in terms of acquisition, dissolution, and survival? This article answers this crucial question of strategy and elaborates on the extent to which the outcome is under top management control. Our findings highlight the importance of technology investments and we identify factors that make such investments possible and profitable. Our results emphasize that firms weighing options must assess the economic meaningfulness of generational technology investments which result in narrowing profit margins and intensifying competition. Another insight concerns the management of political risks. Long-term fluctuations in regulation and foreign trade policy make it hazardous to optimize to the contemporary political regime. Skillful strategists invest in geographical and technological complexity, which in combination increase the chances of survival in rapidly changing political regimes.
机译:研究摘要我们探讨了随着时间的流逝,入口和出口的质量差异。我们使用200年来96家公司的定性和定量数据,从个人决策情况的角度研究行业发展。我们的历史和统计分析揭示了技术投资在确定公司业绩方面的关键作用,以及导致公司进行投资或弃权的技术,体制和治理动力。我们的主要理论和方法论贡献涉及作为企业发展理论基础的企业层面的理性和决策的多样性的重要性。管理摘要在收购,解散和生存方面,决定公司业绩的因素是什么?本文回答了这个至关重要的战略问题,并详细说明了结果在最高管理层的控制下的程度。我们的发现突出了技术投资的重要性,并且我们确定了使此类投资成为可能和获利的因素。我们的结果强调,权衡选择权的公司必须评估代际技术投资的经济意义,这将导致利润空间缩小和竞争加剧。另一个见解涉及政治风险的管理。监管和外贸政策的长期波动使得优化当代政治体制非常危险。熟练的战略家对地理和技术复杂性进行投资,这增加了在迅速变化的政治体制中生存的机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号