首页> 外文期刊>Strategic Management Journal >Nation-dyadic history and cross-border corporate deals: Role of conflict, trade, generational distance, and professional education
【24h】

Nation-dyadic history and cross-border corporate deals: Role of conflict, trade, generational distance, and professional education

机译:民族传统史和跨国公司交易:冲突,贸易,世代相传和专业教育的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Research Summary This paper explores why and how nation-dyadic history impacts aggregated firm decisions involving cross-border activities (acquisitions, joint ventures, and alliances). We contextualize history and illustrate the negative effect of historical conflict on cross-border deals. Nation-dyads with historical conflict incorporate negative sentiments into their social and collective memories and national identities. Members of society assume the socially constructed national identity via primary and secondary socialization. National identities incorporate sentiments towards other nations and condition individuals' preferences, culminating in a preference-biased search for or preference-supporting evaluation of information concerning cross-border deals. An increased generational distance from prior conflict and a higher percentage of graduates with common professional identities constructed by higher education in the social sciences, law, and business dampen the negative influence of historical conflict.Managerial Summary There is a reciprocal relationship between international trade and conflict across two nations: as the potential for conflict increases, trade levels fall, and as trade levels increase, the potential for conflict rises. We disentangle this relationship and determine the implications of historical conflict between two nations for cross-border corporate deals (i.e., acquisitions/joint ventures/alliances). We show that, controlling for other factors, more frequent historical conflict discourages cross-border corporate deals. We see this finding as a result of biased decision making based on preferences which reflect sentiments formed by national identities. Two mechanisms dampen the negative relationship between binational conflict and cross-border deals: a higher percentage of business/law/social sciences graduates and a higher number of generations passed since the last conflict.
机译:研究摘要本文探讨了为什么民族二元历史会对涉及跨境活动(收购,合资企业和联盟)的综合公司决策产生影响,以及如何影响这种历史。我们将历史背景化,并说明历史冲突对跨境交易的负面影响。具有历史冲突的民族,将消极情绪纳入其社会和集体记忆以及民族认同。社会成员通过初级和次级社会化来承担由社会建构的国民身份。国家认同融合了对其他国家的情感,并限制了个人的偏好,最终导致偏好偏好搜索或偏好支持评估有关跨国交易的信息。与先前冲突的世代距离增加,高等教育在社会科学,法律和商业领域构建的具有共同专业身份的毕业生所占比例更高,这减轻了历史冲突的负面影响。管理摘要国际贸易与冲突之间存在对等关系跨两个国家:随着冲突可能性的增加,贸易水平下降,而随着贸易水平的增加,冲突的可能性上升。我们解开了这种关系,并确定了两国之间历史冲突对跨国公司交易(即收购/合资/联盟)的影响。我们表明,在控制其他因素的情况下,更频繁的历史冲突不利于跨境公司交易。我们认为这一发现是基于偏好的偏见决策的结果,这些偏好反映了民族认同感所形成的情感。有两种机制可以减轻两国冲突和跨境交易之间的负面关系:自上次冲突以来,商业/法律/社会科学专业毕业生的比例更高,而通过的世代数量也更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号