首页> 外文期刊>Strategic Management Journal >Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants
【24h】

Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants

机译:定性研究的透明度和可复制性:以精英线人访谈为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Research SummaryWe used interviews with elite informants as a case study to illustrate the need to expand the discussion of transparency and replicability to qualitative methodology. An analysis of 52 articles published in Strategic Management Journal revealed that none of them were sufficiently transparent to allow for exact replication, empirical replication, or conceptual replication. We offer 12 transparency criteria, and behaviorallyanchored ratings scales to measure them, that can be used by authors as they plan and conduct qualitative research as well as by journal reviewers and editors when they evaluate the transparency of submitted manuscripts. We hope our article will serve as a catalyst for improving the degree of transparency and replicability of future qualitative research.Managerial SummaryIf organizations implement practices based on published research, will they produce results consistent with those reported in the articles? To answer this question, it is critical that published articles be transparent in terms of what has been done, why, and how. We investigated 52 articles published in Strategic Management Journal that reported interviewing elite informants (e.g., members of the top management team) and found that none of the articles were sufficiently transparent. These results lead to thorny questions about the trustworthiness of published research, but also important opportunities for future improvements about research transparency and replicability. We offer recommendations on 12 transparency criteria, and how to measure them, that can be used to evaluate past as well as future research using qualitative methods.
机译:研究摘要我们以对精英线人的采访作为案例研究来说明有必要将对透明性和可复制性的讨论扩展到定性方法论。对《战略管理期刊》上发表的52篇文章进行的分析显示,这些文章都没有足够透明以允许进行精确的复制,经验复制或概念复制。我们提供了12个透明度标准,并采用了行为锚定的等级量表来对其进行衡量,它们可以在作者计划和进行定性研究时使用,也可以由期刊审阅者和编辑评估稿件的透明度时使用。我们希望本文能为提高未来定性研究的透明度和可复制性起到催化剂的作用。管理摘要如果组织根据已发表的研究成果实施实践,其结果是否与文章中报道的相符?为了回答这个问题,至关重要的是,已发表的文章在完成的内容,原因和方式方面必须透明。我们调查了《战略管理杂志》上发表的52篇文章,这些文章报道了采访精英线人(例如高层管理团队的成员)的结果,发现没有一篇文章足够透明。这些结果引发了有关已发表研究的可信赖性的棘手问题,但也为未来提高研究透明度和可复制性提供了重要机会。我们提供了有关12个透明度标准以及如何测量它们的建议,这些建议可用于使用定性方法评估过去和未来的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号