首页> 外文期刊>Strategic Management Journal >DO BRIDGING TIES COMPLEMENT STRONG TIES? AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF ALLIANCE AMBIDEXTERITY
【24h】

DO BRIDGING TIES COMPLEMENT STRONG TIES? AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF ALLIANCE AMBIDEXTERITY

机译:桥接领带是否结实牢固?联盟敏捷性的实证检验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study examines the underexplored tensions and complementarities between bridging ties and strong ties in innovation-seeking alliances. Bridging ties span structural holes to provide innovation potential but lack integration capacity, and strong ties provide integration capacity but lack innovation potential. We theoretically develop the idea that-notwithstanding their tensions-strong ties complement bridging ties in enhancing alliance ambidexterity at the project level. While bridging ties provide access to diverse, structural hole-spanning perspectives and capabilities, strong ties help integrate them to realize an innovation. We also propose that their effects and complementarities influence alliance ambidexterity because they facilitate knowledge integration at the project level. Tests using data on 42 innovation-seeking project alliances involving a major American services conglomerate and its alliance partners support the majority of the proposed ideas. Implications for interfirm network configuration, strategic alliances, and the broader strategy literature are also discussed.
机译:这项研究考察了寻求创新的联盟中的纽带关系与牢固关系之间尚未充分探索的张力和互补性。桥接关系跨越结构性漏洞以提供创新潜力,但缺乏整合能力,而牢固的联系提供整合能力,但缺乏创新潜力。我们从理论上提出了这样的想法:尽管他们之间存在紧张关系,但在项目一级增强联盟的灵活性时,牢固的关系会补充桥接关系。桥接关系提供了访问各种结构性洞察力和能力的途径,而牢固的关系则有助于将它们集成起来以实现创新。我们还建议,它们的影响和互补性会影响联盟的灵活性,因为它们有助于在项目级别进行知识集成。使用涉及42个寻求创新的项目联盟的数据进行的测试,这些项目联盟涉及一家美国主要服务集团及其联盟合作伙伴,支持大多数提议的想法。还讨论了企业间网络配置,战略联盟以及更广泛的战略文献的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号