首页> 外文期刊>Strategic Management Journal >COMPLEMENTARITY, CAPABILITIES, AND THE BOUNDARIES OF THE FIRM: THE IMPACT OF WITHIN-FIRM AND INTERFIRM EXPERTISE ON CONCURRENT SOURCING OF COMPLEMENTARY COMPONENTS
【24h】

COMPLEMENTARITY, CAPABILITIES, AND THE BOUNDARIES OF THE FIRM: THE IMPACT OF WITHIN-FIRM AND INTERFIRM EXPERTISE ON CONCURRENT SOURCING OF COMPLEMENTARY COMPONENTS

机译:企业的互补性,能力和边界:企业内部和企业内部专长对补充组件同时采购的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Theories of the firm raise conflicting arguments about how complementarities between two or more components affect firms' knowledge and production boundaries. Traditional arguments in the boundaries of the firm literature suggest that firms will tend to produce sets of complementary components internally, while more recent modularity studies argue that firms can outsource to gain flexibility. We resolve these views by examining concurrent sourcing, which arises when firms both make and buy the same components. We argue that concurrent sourcing of complementary components becomes more common in two cases: when firms have relevant knowledge about the components in conjunction with suppliers (interfirm expertise) and, perhaps more surprisingly, within the firm (within-firm shared expertise). The results suggest that firms often need to make in order to know, but can partially outsource if they possess sufficient expertise.
机译:企业的理论引发了关于两个或多个组成部分之间的互补性如何影响企业的知识和生产边界的争论。公司文献范围内的传统论点表明,公司将倾向于在内部产生互补的组件集,而最近的模块化研究则认为公司可以外包以获得灵活性。我们通过检查并发采购来解决这些观点,当公司制造和购买相同的组件时就会出现这种情况。我们认为,在以下两种情况下,互补组件的并发采购变得越来越普遍:当企业与供应商(企业内部专业知识)一起拥有有关组件的相关知识时,或者更令人惊讶的是,企业内部(企业内部共享专业知识)。结果表明,企业通常需要做才能知道,但是如果他们拥有足够的专业知识,则可以部分外包。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号