首页> 外文期刊>Strategic Management Journal >CHOICE AND PERFORMANCE OF GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS: MATCHING ALLIANCE GOVERNANCE TO ASSET TYPE
【24h】

CHOICE AND PERFORMANCE OF GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS: MATCHING ALLIANCE GOVERNANCE TO ASSET TYPE

机译:治理机制的选择和性能:将联盟治理与资产类型匹配

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Formal and relational governance mechanisms are used in strategic alliances to coordinate resources and mitigate the risk of opportunistic behavior. While recent work has shown that these approaches are not mutually exclusive, we understand little about when one approach is superior to the other. Using data on the governance choices and subsequent performance of alliances in the German telecommunications industry, we find that the optimal configuration of formal and relational governance mechanisms depends on the assets involved in an alliance, with formal mechanisms best suited to property-based assets and relational governance best suited to knowledge-based assets. Furthermore, a mismatch between governance mechanisms and asset type can harm the performance of the alliance. Our findings contribute to transaction cost economics, the literature on relational governance, and recent work studying their interaction.
机译:战略联盟使用正式和关系治理机制来协调资源并降低机会主义行为的风险。尽管最近的工作表明这些方法不是相互排斥的,但我们对何时一种方法优于另一种方法了解甚少。使用有关德国电信业中联盟的治理选择和后续绩效的数据,我们发现正式和关系治理机制的最佳配置取决于联盟中涉及的资产,而正式机制最适合基于财产的资产和关系最适合基于知识的资产的治理。此外,治理机制和资产类型之间的不匹配会损害联盟的绩效。我们的发现有助于交易成本经济学,有关关系治理的文献以及研究它们之间相互作用的最新工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号