首页> 外文期刊>OR Spectrum >Supplier credits, limited liquidity, and timely demand information
【24h】

Supplier credits, limited liquidity, and timely demand information

机译:供应商信用,有限的流动性和及时的需求信息

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We consider supplier-credit contracting between a manufacturer and a liquidity-constrained dealer. We show that the timeliness according to which the dealer receives demand information has a significant impact on the optimal contract. If the manufacturer cannot be sure that a dealer without liquidity has demand information when the contract is written, the optimal contract assigns the same quantity to an ignorant dealer and a dealer who knows that there are unfavorable demand conditions. However, dealers with favorable demand information are screened. If the dealer’s liquidity rises, the manufacturer proposes a contract that resembles the solution of a classic adverse selection model in the spirit of Harris et al. (Manag Sci 28:604–620, 1982). For high liquidity, the optimal supplier-credit contract assigns the same quantity to an ignorant dealer and dealers who have favorable demand information whereas dealers with unfavorable demand information are screened.
机译:我们考虑制造商与流动性受限的经销商之间的供应商信贷合同。我们表明,经销商接收需求信息所依据的及时性对最优合同具有重大影响。如果制造商在签订合同时不能确定没有流动性的经销商是否有需求信息,则最佳合同会将相同数量的货品分配给无知的经销商和知道存在不利需求条件的经销商。但是,筛选具有良好需求信息的经销商。如果经销商的流动性增加,那么制造商会根据Harris等人的精神提出一份类似于经典逆向选择模型的解决方案的合同。 (Manag Sci 28:604-620,1982)。对于高流动性,最佳供应商信贷合同将相同数量分配给无知的经销商和需求信息有利的经销商,而筛选出需求信息不利的经销商。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号