首页> 外文期刊>OR Spectrum >A log-robust optimization approach to portfolio management
【24h】

A log-robust optimization approach to portfolio management

机译:对数鲁棒优化的投资组合管理方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We present a robust optimization approach to portfolio management under uncertainty that builds upon insights gained from the well-known Lognormal model for stock prices, while addressing the model’s limitations, in particular, the issue of fat tails being underestimated in the Gaussian framework and the active debate on the correct distribution to use. Our approach, which we call Log-robust in the spirit of the Lognormal model, does not require any probabilistic assumption, and incorporates the randomness on the continuously compounded rates of return by using range forecasts and a budget of uncertainty, thus capturing the decision-maker’s degree of risk aversion through a single, intuitive parameter. Our objective is to maximize the worst-case portfolio value (over a set of allowable deviations of the uncertain parameters from their nominal values) at the end of the time horizon in a one-period setting; short sales are not allowed. We formulate the robust problem as a linear programming problem and derive theoretical insights into the worst-case uncertainty and the optimal allocation. We then compare in numerical experiments the Log-robust approach with the traditional robust approach, where range forecasts are applied directly to the stock returns. Our results indicate that the Log-robust approach significantly outperforms the benchmark with respect to 95 or 99% Value-at-Risk. This is because the traditional robust approach leads to portfolios that are far less diversified.
机译:我们提出了一种在不确定情况下强大的投资组合管理优化方法,该方法基于从著名的对数正态模型得出的股票价格的见解,同时解决了该模型的局限性,特别是高斯框架和主动模型中低估了肥尾问题讨论使用的正确分配方式。根据对数正态模型的精神,我们将这种方法称为对数鲁棒性,它不需要任何概率假设,并且通过使用范围预测和不确定性预算将随机性纳入了连续复合收益率,从而捕获了决策-通过一个直观的参数确定制造商的风险规避程度。我们的目标是在一个时间段的时间范围结束时最大化最坏情况的投资组合值(在不确定参数与其名义值的允许偏差范围内);不允许卖空。我们将鲁棒问题表述为线性规划问题,并从理论上得出最坏情况的不确定性和最优分配的见解。然后,我们在数值实验中将对数鲁棒方法与传统的鲁棒方法进行比较,后者将范围预测直接应用于股票收益。我们的结果表明,就95或99%的风险价值而言,对数鲁棒性方法明显优于基准。这是因为传统的稳健方法导致投资组合的多元化程度大大降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号