首页> 外文期刊>Sophia >Graham Ward’s Poststructuralist Christian Nominalism
【24h】

Graham Ward’s Poststructuralist Christian Nominalism

机译:格雷厄姆·沃德(Graham Ward)的后结构主义基督教名义主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In his Cities of God, Graham Ward advocates for what he calls an ‘analogical worldview’. On the one hand, he suggests that this analogical worldview has its roots in pre-modern theology and philosophy, especially in Augustine and Aquinas. On the other hand, Graham Ward draws heavily on contemporary critical theory to express this view. The thesis defended in this paper is that by reading the concept of analogy from Augustine and Aquinas in terms of contemporary critical theory, especially that of Jacques Derrida, Ward develops an analogical worldview that has strikingly nominalist ramifications. These ramifications imply that, in the end, there is no longer an adequacy between the perceiving mind and the reality perceived. The argument is developed in three steps. In the first step, Ward’s reading of contemporary critical theory, especially with respect to Derrida, is introduced. In the second step, the theological appropriation of Derrida in the analogical worldview is analyzed. In the third step, the nominalist implications of this application are shown in terms of Ward’s critique of privileging heterosexual relationships. In this third section, I will also deal more extensively and precisely with the question of what I mean by labeling his work as ‘nominalism’ as well as outlining the specific form of nominalism that I am here invoking. In the penultimate section, I will attempt to show that Ward’s nominalism can also be found in the works of Milbank and Pickstock, as it has to do with the specific way in which they take up the Platonic tradition. In my concluding remarks, I will come back to the discussion about the ontological status of sexual relations, indicating my own view on this issue.
机译:格雷厄姆·沃德(Graham Ward)在他的“上帝之城”中倡导他所谓的“模拟世界观”。一方面,他认为这种类比的世界观源于前现代神学和哲学,特别是在奥古斯丁和阿奎那。另一方面,格雷厄姆·沃德(Graham Ward)则大量借鉴当代批评理论来表达这一观点。本文辩护的论点是,沃德通过从当代批判理论(尤其是雅克·德里达)的当代批判理论中读取了奥古斯丁和阿奎那的类比概念,从而发展出一种具有明显的名义主义影响的类比世界观。这些后果暗示着,最终,感知的思维与所感知的现实之间不再是足够的。该论点分为三个步骤。第一步,介绍了沃德对当代批判理论的理解,特别是对德里达的理解。在第二步中,分析了德里达在类比世界观中的神学占有。第三步,以沃德对特权异性恋关系的批判来说明这种应用的名义主义含义。在第三部分中,我还将通过将他的作品标记为“名义主义”,并概述我在这里援引的唯名主义的具体形式,来更广泛,准确地讨论我的意思。在倒数第二节中,我将试图表明沃德的唯名主义也可以在米尔班克和皮克斯托克的作品中找到,这与他们接受柏拉图传统的特定方式有关。在结束语中,我将回到有关性关系的本体论地位的讨论中,表达我对这个问题的看法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号