首页> 外文期刊>Soils and foundations >Effect of reinforcement length for different geosynthetic reinforcements on strip footing on sand soil
【24h】

Effect of reinforcement length for different geosynthetic reinforcements on strip footing on sand soil

机译:不同土工合成材料加筋长度对砂土条形基础的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper presents the results of laboratory model tests of a surface strip footing on unreinforced and reinforced sand beds to investigate the effects of reinforcement length. Multiples of footing width B were employed in the tests, namely B. 2B, 3B, 5B and, in some tests, even 7B. The type and number of reinforcements were also varied to determine whether these parameters had an influence on the optimum reinforcement length. The comprehensive results from laboratory model tests on strip footings supported on a woven geotextile and different Geogrids are presented. The load settlement and Bearing Ratio values obtained from the model test program were compared. Based on the results, the length of footing required to achieve optimum improvement was determined for different numbers of reinforcement layers and different reinforcement types. It was also observed that the improvement obtained by reinforcing the subgrade was different for low settlement ratio values and large settlement values. (C) 2015 The Japanese Geotechnical Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier By. All rights reserved.
机译:本文介绍了在未加固和加固的砂床上的表面条形基础的实验室模型测试结果,以研究加固长度的影响。在测试中采用了脚宽B的倍数,即B. 2B,3B,5B,在某些测试中甚至是7B。钢筋的类型和数量也有所不同,以确定这些参数是否对最佳钢筋长度有影响。介绍了在编织土工布和不同土工格栅上支撑的带状基础的实验室模型测试的综合结果。比较了从模型测试程序获得的载荷沉降和轴承比值。根据结果​​,针对不同数量的增强层和不同的增强类型确定了实现最佳改进所需的基础长度。还可以观察到,对于低沉降率值和较大沉降值而言,加固路基所获得的改善是不同的。 (C)2015年日本岩土学会。由Elsevier By生产和托管。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号