...
首页> 外文期刊>Software and systems modeling >Graph and model transformation tools for model migration
【24h】

Graph and model transformation tools for model migration

机译:用于模型迁移的图形和模型转换工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We describe the results of the Transformation Tool Contest 2010 workshop, in which nine graph and model transformation tools were compared for specifying model migration. The model migration problem-migration of UML activity diagrams from version 1.4 to version 2.2-is non-trivial and practically relevant. The solutions have been compared with respect to several criteria: correctness, conciseness, understandability, appropriateness, maturity and support for extensions to the core migration task. We describe in detail the comparison method, and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the solutions with a special focus on the differences between graph and model transformation for model migration. The comparison results demonstrate tool and language features that strongly impact the efficacy of solutions, such as support for retyping of model elements. The results are used to motivate an agenda for future model migration research (including suggestions for areas in which the tools need to be further improved).
机译:我们描述了Transformation Tool Contest 2010研讨会的结果,其中比较了九种图形和模型转换工具以指定模型迁移。 UML活动图从版本1.4到版本2.2的模型迁移问题迁移是不平凡的,并且在实践上是相关的。已针对几个标准对解决方案进行了比较:正确性,简洁性,易懂性,适当性,成熟度以及对核心迁移任务扩展的支持。我们详细描述了比较方法,并讨论了解决方案的优缺点,特别着重于模型迁移的图形和模型转换之间的差异。比较结果表明,工具和语言功能会严重影响解决方案的效率,例如支持重新键入模型元素。结果将用于激励未来模型迁移研究的议程(包括有关需要进一步改进工具的领域的建议)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号