...
首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering >Comments on 'Formal specification of user interfaces: a comparison and evaluation of four axiomatic approaches' by U.H. Chi
【24h】

Comments on 'Formal specification of user interfaces: a comparison and evaluation of four axiomatic approaches' by U.H. Chi

机译:U.H.对``用户界面的形式规范:四种公理方法的比较和评估''的评论驰

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A recent paper (see ibid., vol.11, no.8, p.671-88, Aug. 1985) compared several axiomatic methods of formal specification, one of which was Z. As a result of a comparison made with Z and a similar, but executable, specification language called Me too, it was pointed out that one of the Z specifications given was not correct. In this response, the erroneous function is described and some conclusions are drawn about the process of formal specification.
机译:最近的一篇论文(参见同上,第11卷,第8期,第671-88页,1985年8月)比较了几种形式规格的公理方法,其中一种是Z。与一种类似但可执行的规范语言(也称为Me)一样,有人指出,给出的Z规范之一是不正确的。在此响应中,描述了错误的功能,并对正式规范的过程得出了一些结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号