首页> 外文期刊>Social Studies of Science >Sociotechnical imaginaries of low-carbon waste-energy futures: UK techno-market fixes displacing public accountability
【24h】

Sociotechnical imaginaries of low-carbon waste-energy futures: UK techno-market fixes displacing public accountability

机译:低碳废能期货的社会科技富翁:英国技术市场修复了流离失所的公共责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To implement EU climate policy, the UK's New Labour government (1997-2010) elaborated an ecomodernist policy framework. It promoted technological innovation to provide low-carbon renewable energy, especially by treating waste as a resource. This framework discursively accommodated rival sociotechnical imaginaries, understood as visions of feasible and desirable futures available through technoscientific development. According to the dominant imaginary, techno-market fixes stimulate low-carbon technologies by making current centralized systems more resource-efficient (as promoted by industry incumbents). According to the alternative eco-localization imaginary, a shift to low-carbon systems should instead localize resource flows, output uses and institutional responsibility (as promoted by civil society groups). The UK government policy framework gained political authority by accommodating both imaginaries. As we show by drawing on three case studies, the realization of both imaginaries depended on institutional changes and material-economic resources of distinctive kinds. In practice, financial incentives drove technological design towards trajectories that favour the dominant sociotechnical imaginary, while marginalizing the eco-localization imaginary and its environmental benefits. The ecomodernist policy framework relegates responsibility to anonymous markets, thus displacing public accountability of the state and industry. These dynamics indicate the need for STS research on how alternative sociotechnical imaginaries mobilize support for their realization, rather than be absorbed into the dominant imaginary.
机译:为实施欧盟气候政策,英国的新劳动政府(1997-2010)详细阐述了一个经济形制主义政策框架。它促进了技术创新,提供低碳可再生能源,特别是通过将废物作为资源。该框架被提出了被提出的竞争对手社会科技富翁,理解为通过技术发展可行的可行和理想的未来的愿景。根据主导的想象,技术市场修复通过使流动的集中系统更具资源效率(正如行业现任者推广),刺激低碳技术。根据替代生态本地化虚构,转向低碳系统,而是应定位资源流量,产出用途和制度责任(如民间社会团体促进)。英国政府政策框架通过适应两种富翁,获得政治权威。正如我们通过三个案例研究所展示的,朝着富有思想的实现依赖于独特的种类的体制变化和物质 - 经济资源。在实践中,金融激励使技术设计推向有利于主导的社会科技虚构的轨迹,同时将生态定位的虚构和环境效益边缘化。 ECOMODERNIST政策框架降级对匿名市场的责任,从而取代了国家和行业的公共责任。这些动态表明了STS研究替代社会科技富翁如何调动支持他们的实现,而不是被吸收到主要的虚构中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号