首页> 外文期刊>Social Studies of Science >Metadata accounts: Achieving data and evidence in scientific research
【24h】

Metadata accounts: Achieving data and evidence in scientific research

机译:元数据帐户:在科学研究中获得数据和证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

'Metadata' has received a fraction of the attention that 'data' has received in sociological studies of scientific research. A neglect of 'metadata' reduces the attention on a number of critical aspects of scientific work processes, including documentary work, accountability relations, and collaboration routines. Metadata processes and products are essential components of the work needed to practically accomplish day-to-day scientific research tasks, and are central to ensuring that research findings and products meet externally driven standards or requirements. This article is an attempt to open up the discussion on and conceptualization of metadata within the sociology of science and the sociology of data. It presents ethnographic research of metadata creation within everyday scientific practice, focusing on how researchers document, describe, annotate, organize and manage their data, both for their own use and the use of researchers outside of their project. In particular, this article argues that the role and significance of metadata within scientific research contexts are intimately tied to the nature of evidence and accountability within particular social situations. Studying metadata can (1) provide insight into the production of evidence, that is, how something we might call 'data' becomes able to serve an evidentiary role, and (2) provide a mechanism for revealing what people in research contexts are held accountable for, and what they achieve accountability with.
机译:在科学研究的社会学研究中,“元数据”得到的关注只是“数据”得到的关注的一小部分。对“元数据”的忽视减少了对科学工作流程的许多关键方面的关注,包括文献工作,问责制关系和协作程序。元数据过程和产品是实际完成日常科学研究任务所需工作的重要组成部分,并且对于确保研究结果和产品满足外部驱动的标准或要求至关重要。本文试图在科学社会学和数据社会学中展开元数据的讨论和概念化。它介绍了日常科学实践中对元数据创建的人种学研究,重点是研究人员如何记录,描述,注释,组织和管理其数据,以供他们自己使用以及项目外的研究人员使用。特别是,本文认为,元数据在科学研究环境中的作用和重要性与特定社会情况下证据的性质和问责制密切相关。研究元数据可以(1)提供对证据产生的见解,也就是说,我们可以称之为“数据”的东西如何能够充当举证角色,并且(2)提供一种机制来揭示在研究环境中哪些人被追究责任以及他们实现问责制的目的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号