首页> 外文期刊>Social Studies of Science >Understanding 'anticipatory governance'
【24h】

Understanding 'anticipatory governance'

机译:了解“预期治理”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Anticipatory governance is 'a broad-based capacity extended through society that can act on a variety of inputs to manage emerging knowledge-based technologies while such management is still possible'. It motivates activities designed to build capacities in foresight, engagement, and integration - as well as through their production ensemble. These capacities encourage and support the reflection of scientists, engineers, policy makers, and other publics on their roles in new technologies. This article reviews the early history of the National Nanotechnology Initiative in the United States, and it further explicates anticipatory governance through exploring the genealogy of the term and addressing a set of critiques found in the literature. These critiques involve skepticism of three proximities of anticipatory governance: to its object, nanotechnology, which is a relatively indistinct one; to the public, which remains almost utterly naive toward nanotechnology; and to technoscience itself, which allegedly renders anticipatory governance complicit in its hubris. The article concludes that the changing venues and the amplification within them of the still, small voices of folks previously excluded from offering constructive visions of futures afforded by anticipatory governance may not be complete solutions to our woes in governing technology, but they certainly can contribute to bending the long arc of technoscience more toward humane ends.
机译:预期治理是“通过社会扩展的基础广泛的能力,可以对各种投入采取行动,以管理新兴的基于知识的技术,而仍然可以进行这种管理”。它激发旨在增强远见,参与和整合能力的活动,以及通过其生产合奏。这些能力鼓励并支持科学家,工程师,政策制定者和其他公众对其在新技术中的作用的反思。本文回顾了美国国家纳米技术计划的早期历史,并通过探讨该术语的家谱并解决了文献中发现的一系列批评,进一步阐明了预期治理。这些批评涉及对预期治理的三个邻近性的怀疑:对它的目标来说,纳米技术是相对模糊的。对公众而言,公众对纳米技术仍然几乎完全幼稚;以及技术科学本身,据称这使预期治理变得自负。文章得出的结论是,以前无法从前瞻性治理提供对未来的建设性构想的人们中,静止的,​​微小的声音不断变化的场所和在他们内部的放大可能不是解决我们治理技术难题的完整解决方案,但它们无疑可以为将技术科学的长弧更加向人性化方向发展。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Social Studies of Science》 |2014年第2期|218-242|共25页
  • 作者

    David H Guston;

  • 作者单位

    School of Politics and Global Studies, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA Center for Nanotechnology in Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes, Arizona State University, Interdisciplinary B 366, 1120 S. Cady Mall, PO Box 87S603, Tempe, AZ 85287-5603, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    anticipatory governance; emerging technologies; foresight; nanotechnology; public engagement; responsible innovation;

    机译:预期治理;新兴技术;预见纳米技术公众参与;负责任的创新;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:55:07

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号