首页> 外文期刊>Social Studies of Science >Hot air ablowin! 'Media-speak', social conflict, and the Australian 'decoupled' wind farm controversy
【24h】

Hot air ablowin! 'Media-speak', social conflict, and the Australian 'decoupled' wind farm controversy

机译:热风亚伯温! “媒体演讲”,社会冲突以及澳大利亚“脱钩”的风电场争议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In work in science, technology, and society social conflict around wind farms has a growing profile, not least because it draws our attention to two key interrelated themes: 'science, technology and governance' and 'socio-technological systems'. In this article on Australian wind farm development and siting, these themes are highlighted in contexts of sustainability, legitimacy, and competency for policy effectiveness. There is enduring social conflict around wind farms at the local community level, but little government understanding of this conflict or willingness to respond adequately to resolve it. This article examines the conflict through the lens of print media analysis. A key finding of the five identified is that people seeing wind farms as spoiling a sense of place is a primary cause of enduring social conflict at the local community level around wind farms, alongside significant environmental issues and inadequate community engagement; this finding also indicates a central reason for the highly problematic state of Australian wind energy transitions. In turn, by identifying this problematic situation as one of a significantly 'decoupled' and 'dysfunctional' condition of the Australian socio-technological wind farm development and siting system, I suggest remedies including those of a deliberative nature that also respond to the Habermas-Mouffe debate. These inform a socio-technical siting approach or pathway to better respect and navigate contested landscapes for enhanced renewable energy transitions at the local level.
机译:在科学,技术和社会领域的工作中,风电场周围的社会冲突越来越多,这不仅是因为它引起我们对两个关键的相关主题的关注:“科学,技术与治理”和“社会技术系统”。在有关澳大利亚风电场发展和选址的这篇文章中,在可持续性,合法性和政策有效性能力的背景下突出了这些主题。在地方社区,风电场周围一直存在着持久的社会冲突,但是政府对这种冲突的了解或对解决这一冲突的意愿很少。本文通过印刷媒体分析的角度来考察冲突。在确定的五个中的一个关键发现是,人们认为风电场破坏了位置感,这是导致风电场周围地方社区持续社会冲突的主要原因,同时还存在重大的环境问题和社区参与度不足;这一发现也表明了澳大利亚风能过渡问题严重的主要原因。反过来,通过将这种有问题的情况确定为澳大利亚社会技术风电场开发和选址系统的显着“脱钩”和“功能失调”状况之一,我建议采取补救措施,包括具有议定性质的补救措施,这些措施也应对哈贝马斯-穆菲辩论。这些提供了一种社会技术选址方法或途径,可以更好地尊重和驾驭有争议的景观,以增强地方一级的可再生能源过渡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号