首页> 外文期刊>Social Studies of Science >Tensions in agnotology: Normativity in the studies of commercially driven ignorance
【24h】

Tensions in agnotology: Normativity in the studies of commercially driven ignorance

机译:矛盾学中的张力:商业驱动的无知研究中的规范性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As scientific research moves increasingly to the private sector, the social organization of science undergoes important transformations. Focusing on the production of ignorance, agnotology has been a fruitful approach to understanding the social and epistemic consequences of the recent commercialization of scientific research. Despite their important contributions, scholars working on agnotology seem to hold implicit normative commitments that are in tension with their descriptive accounts of ignorance-constructive practices. The main aim of this article is to uncover these commitments and to expose the emerging tensions. Thus, this article begins an exploration into normative aspects of the studies of ignorance. In particular, it shows that agnotology still needs the support of a well-articulated normative approach capable of identifying and evaluating the epistemic and social concerns raised by the private funding and performance of science.
机译:随着科学研究越来越向私营部门发展,科学的社会组织正在发生重要的转变。专注于无知的产生,认识论一直是了解近来科学研究商业化的社会和认知后果的有效方法。尽管他们做出了重要贡献,但是从事非共融学研究的学者似乎持有隐含的规范性承诺,这与他们对无知-建设性实践的描述性描述相矛盾。本文的主要目的是揭示这些承诺并揭露新出现的紧张局势。因此,本文开始探索无知研究的规范方面。特别是,它表明,非共融学仍然需要一种明确表达的规范方法的支持,该方法能够确定和评估私人资金和科学绩效所引起的认识论和社会关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号