首页> 外文期刊>Social Studies of Science >Higher and colder: The success and failure of boundaries in high altitude and Antarctic research stations
【24h】

Higher and colder: The success and failure of boundaries in high altitude and Antarctic research stations

机译:更高和更低:高海拔和南极研究站边界的成败

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article offers a series of case studies of field stations and field laboratories based at high altitudes in the Alps, Himalayas and Antarctica, which have been used by Western scientists (largely physiologists and physicists) from circa 1820 to present. It rejects the common frame for work on such spaces that polarizes a set of generalizations about practices undertaken in the field' versus the laboratory'. Field sites are revealed as places that can be used to highlight common and crucial features of modern experimental science that are exposed by, but not uniquely the properties of, fieldwork. This includes heterogeneity of population and practice, diverse afterlives, the manner in which spaces of science construct individual and group expertise, and the extensive support and funding structures needed for modern scientific work.
机译:本文提供了一系列基于阿尔卑斯山,喜马拉雅山和南极洲高海拔地区的野外观测站和野外实验室的案例研究,大约在1820年左右,西方科学家(主要是生理学家和物理学家)一直在使用它们。它拒绝了在这样的空间上进行工作的通用框架,这种框架使关于在现场“相对于实验室”所采取的实践的一套概括化了。现场地点被揭示为可以用来突出现代实验科学的共同和关键特征的地方,这些特征暴露于但并非唯一地反映了田野调查的性质。这包括人口与实践的异质性,来世的多样性,科学空间构建个人和团体专业知识的方式以及现代科学工作所需的广泛支持和资金结构。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号