首页> 外文期刊>Social Sciences in China >Several Issues in Research on State Emergence in China
【24h】

Several Issues in Research on State Emergence in China

机译:中国国家出现研究中的几个问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

, , , , , , , : There is no consensus in international academia on the absolutely universal appearance of chiefdom in all parts of the world. Making this point clear has positive significance for the correct understanding of the original meaning of the concept and theory of chiefdom. Further researches on the distribution of chiefdoms in Europe and other parts of the world, based on studies of ancient Greek and early medieval Germanic cases, will not change our basic understanding of the chiefdom model’s applicability to the case of China, nor will it pose a serious challenge to the ongoing researches on state emergence in China. It is undoubtedly very helpful if we diligently apply foreign academic findings to our own studies in this subject, but genuine and in-depth understanding is necessary, if researchers are to accurately interpret and sum up the real implications of these foreign materials. At present, some Chinese scholars have produced various generalizations based on their own understanding of foreign research results. However, since they are not based on careful study of the original literary sources and other materials, those “generalized” views are often inaccurate. This is a problem that deserves our serious attention in current researches.View full textDownload full textKeywordschiefdom, tribal confederacy, origin of the stateRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2012.677291
机译:,,,,,,,:在国际上,关于酋长制在世界各地的绝对普遍出现尚无共识。明确这一点对正确理解酋长国概念和理论的本义具有积极意义。基于对古希腊和早期德国日耳曼案的研究,对欧洲和世界其他地区的酋长分布情况的进一步研究不会改变我们对酋长模型在中国案例中适用性的基本理解,也不会改变这对正在进行的关于中国国家崛起的研究提出了严峻的挑战。如果我们认真地将外国学术研究成果运用于本学科,这无疑是非常有帮助的,但是,如果研究人员要准确地解释和总结这些外国材料的真实含义,则必须有真正和深入的理解。目前,一些中国学者根据自己对国外研究成果的理解,产生了各种概括。但是,由于它们不是基于对原始文学资源和其他材料的仔细研究,因此这些“概括”观点通常是不准确的。这个问题在当前的研究中值得我们认真研究。 Delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2012.677291

著录项

  • 来源
    《Social Sciences in China》 |2012年第2期|p.164-180|共17页
  • 作者

    Xie Weiyanga;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:53:14

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号