首页> 外文期刊>Social Indicators Research >Quality of Life from the Voting Booth: The Effect of Crime Rates and Income on Recent U.S. Presidential Elections
【24h】

Quality of Life from the Voting Booth: The Effect of Crime Rates and Income on Recent U.S. Presidential Elections

机译:投票亭的生活质量:犯罪率和收入对最近美国总统大选的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Quality of Life (QOL) is often measured with surveys of citizen’s satisfaction. In contrast, the current research uses already-existing voting data to infer citizens’ perceptions of QOL. Under this model, citizens decide how much their QOL has improved (or declined) since the last election, and then vote to reward (or punish) the incumbent party accordingly. Analysis of the popular vote for the incumbent party then allows inference on how citizens judge their QOL and how they weight the various domains. Previous research has concluded that voters reward an incumbent who improves the economic domain prior to election. I test whether voters also reward declining crime rates, and estimate how citizens weight the relative importance of each in determining QOL. I analyze the vote shares by state from U.S. presidential elections from 1972 to 1996. Results show that changes in crime rates do influence vote share, consistent with the responsibility hypothesis, but to a smaller degree than the economic domain does. The method described provides convergent evidence that citizens weight domains differentially, and can provide the weights for a national QOL index.
机译:生活质量(QOL)通常是通过对公民满意度的调查来衡量的。相比之下,当前的研究使用已经存在的投票数据来推断公民对QOL的看法。在这种模式下,公民决定自上次选举以来他们的生活质量提高了多少(或降低了),然后投票对现任政党进行奖励(或惩罚)。对现任政党的民众投票进行分析后,就可以推断出公民如何判断自己的生活质量以及他们如何权衡各个领域。先前的研究得出的结论是,选民在选举前会奖励那些改善经济领域的在职者。我测试选民是否也奖励犯罪率下降,并估计公民在确定生活质量时如何权衡每个人的相对重要性。我分析了1972年至1996年美国总统大选期间各州的投票份额。结果表明,犯罪率的变化确实会影响投票份额,这与责任假设相符,但程度要比经济领域小。所描述的方法为公民权重域的差异提供了收敛的证据,并且可以为全国QOL指数提供权重。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号