首页> 外文期刊>Social & Cultural Geography >Between late-lasting empire and late-developing nation-state: a Triestine perspective on city-state relations
【24h】

Between late-lasting empire and late-developing nation-state: a Triestine perspective on city-state relations

机译:在后帝国和后发展民族国家之间:城市背景关系的里雅斯特观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper adopts the case of Trieste to critique ideas that urban authority is always and inevitably surrendered to the state, arguing that the relationship between economic and political change may be more complex than is sometimes acknowledged. Trieste's origins as a multi-ethnic trading community were not a consequence of the absence of state authority, so much as Habsburg calculation of the potential economic advantages of a policy of toleration. Equally, the subsequent erosion of Trieste's cosmopolitan character cannot be understood simply as the triumph of a nationalising Italian state. Trieste thus prompts a call for greater appreciation of variety in the character and identity of European cities, paying attention to the potential distinctiveness of port cities, cosmopolitan trading centres and border cities.
机译:本文以的里雅斯特为例,对城市权威总是不可避免地移交给国家的观点进行了批评,认为经济和政治变革之间的关系可能比有时所承认的更为复杂。的里雅斯特起源于一个多民族的贸易共同体,并不是由于缺乏国家权威,而是哈布斯堡(Habsburg)对宽容政策的潜在经济利益的估算。同样,后来的里雅斯特国际主义风气的侵蚀不能简单地理解为意大利国有化国家的胜利。因此,的里雅斯特号召人们呼吁更多地了解欧洲城市的特征和特性,并注意港口城市,国际贸易中心和边境城市的潜在特色。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号