首页> 外文期刊>Social Biology >Psychological Factors as Mechanisms for Socioeconomic Disparities in Health: A Critical Appraisal of Four Common Factors
【24h】

Psychological Factors as Mechanisms for Socioeconomic Disparities in Health: A Critical Appraisal of Four Common Factors

机译:心理因素作为健康状况中社会经济差异的机制:对四个常见因素的批判性评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Social epidemiology has increasingly looked to psychological factors as both risk factors for physical health and mechanisms behind disparities. Yet, there has been little resolution to the question of whether psychological factors explain disparities, and skepticism has begun to mount about whether psychological factors are causally linked to health. Furthermore, some have questioned the nature of the relationship: most research suggests that psychological factors mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status and health, but recent research suggests that they moderate the relationship. The present paper attempts to provide a more comprehensive appraisal of the current debate. It uses four popular psychological factors (i.e., self-esteem, mastery, neuroticism, and depressive symptoms), three health outcomes, and a nationally representative, three-panel longitudinal survey. The results illustrate the promise and limitations of psychological mechanisms. In the cross-section, the results provide evidence for substantial moderating effects, but these effects disappear entirely when estimated prospectively. The results also provide some evidence for mediating effects, but these effects are very weak and the prospective effects of psychological factors diminish over time and with controls for baseline health. Implications for theories of socioeconomic status and health are discussed and a more social psychologically sophisticated approach is encouraged.
机译:社会流行病学越来越多地将心理因素视为身体健康的风险因素和差距背后的机制。但是,关于心理因素是否能解释差异的问题,解决方案还很少,怀疑论者已开始怀疑心理因素是否与健康有因果关系。此外,一些人对这种关系的性质提出了质疑:大多数研究表明,心理因素介导了社会经济地位与健康之间的关系,但是最近的研究表明,它们可以缓和这种关系。本文试图对当前的辩论提供更全面的评价。它使用了四个流行的心理因素(即自尊,精通,神经质和抑郁症状),三个健康结局和一项具有全国代表性的三面板纵向调查。结果说明了心理机制的前景和局限性。在横截面中,结果提供了明显的缓和作用的证据,但是如果进行前瞻性估计,这些作用将完全消失。结果也为调解作用提供了一些证据,但这些作用非常微弱,心理因素的预期作用会随着时间的流逝以及对基线健康的控制而逐渐减弱。讨论了对社会经济地位和健康理论的影响,并鼓励采用更为社会心理学的方法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Social Biology》 |2004年第2期|p.1-23|共23页
  • 作者

    Jason Schnittker;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Sociology, Population Studies Center, University of Pennsylvania, 3718 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6299;

  • 收录信息 美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 人类学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:45:09

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号