首页> 外文期刊>Topoi >Ramus and Other Renaissance Philosophers on Subjectivity
【24h】

Ramus and Other Renaissance Philosophers on Subjectivity

机译:拉姆斯和其他文艺复兴时期的哲学家

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper considers philosophical approaches that are relevant to the intertwinement of logic, metaphysics, and psychology proposed by the Aquinas commentator Tommaso de Vio Cardinal Cajetan, the humanist Petrus Ramus, the pure Aristotelian Cornelius Martini, the Semi-Ramist Bartholomaeus Keckermann, and the lexicographer Rudolf Goclenius. Mostly, however, it is about Ramus and his followers, the Ramists, because of the role they played in exacerbating a discussion on the constitution of objectivity during the Renaissance that was to have an impact on Cartesian andpost-Cartesian theories of subjectivity. Finally, keeping in mind that Kant was familiar with the secunda Petri, i.e., with the second part of Ramus's logic, namely the theory of judgment, some common ground is recognizable between Ramus and Kant as well. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.
机译:本文考虑了与阿奎那评论员汤马索·德·维奥·红衣主教卡耶坦,人文主义者彼得·拉姆斯,纯正的亚里斯多德·科尼利厄斯·马蒂尼,半拉美主义者巴塞洛缪乌斯·克克尔曼和词法学家提出的与逻辑,形而上学和心理学的交织有关的哲学方法。鲁道夫·哥伦纽斯(Rudolf Goclenius)。但是,主要是关于拉姆斯及其追随者拉美主义者,因为他们在文艺复兴时期加剧了关于客观性构成的讨论中所发挥的作用,这将对笛卡尔和后笛卡尔的主体性理论产生影响。最后,请记住,康德熟悉secunda Petri,即拉姆斯逻辑的第二部分,即判断论,拉姆斯和康德之间也有一些共同点。该修订版于2006年6月在线发布,并更正了涵盖日期。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Topoi》 |2003年第1期|p.00000005-00000013|共9页
  • 作者

    Riccardo Pozzo;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:32:33

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号