首页> 外文期刊>Significance >More scrutiny for scientific statistics
【24h】

More scrutiny for scientific statistics

机译:对科学统计进行更多审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Last year two highly-respected scientific journals were criticised for the poor quality of the statistics in many of their articles. Nature and the British Medical Journal (BMJ) were both found to have published articles in which the authors displayed a worrying lack of knowledge and care when presenting their results. The criticisms were originally made in Incongruence between test statistics and P values in medical papers, by Garcia-Berthou and Alcaraz from the University of Girona in Spain. The authors looked at the statistical results in all 181 papers published in Nature in 2001 and a random sample of 63 results from the BMJ from the same year—and their results were alarming.
机译:去年,两篇备受推崇的科学期刊在其许多文章中均因统计质量差而受到批评。人们发现《自然》和《英国医学杂志》都发表过文章,在发表结果时,作者表现出令人担忧的知识和关怀。这些批评最初是由西班牙赫罗纳大学的Garcia-Berthou和Alcaraz认为测试统计数据与医学论文中的P值不一致引起的。作者查看了2001年《自然》杂志上发表的所有181篇论文的统计结果,以及当年BMJ随机抽取的63篇结果的样本,这些结果令人震惊。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Significance》 |2005年第1期|p.2|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 统计学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:51:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号