首页> 外文期刊>Semiconductor International >300 mm Automation: Perfection or Dead End?
【24h】

300 mm Automation: Perfection or Dead End?

机译:300毫米自动化:完美还是死路?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Will 300 mm equipment designed around SEMI standards solve future factory challenges? Or will the industry be forced to turn to a different solution, such as one based on clusters of automation? Despite all the focus on 300 mm, tumors of the demise of 200 mm wafer processing are greatly exaggerated. The 200 mm sector is very much alive and well and serving industry needs. That's more than can be said for 300 mm technology today. With more than five years of aggressive 300 mm tool development and more than 100 SEMI standards almost exclusively focused on 300 mm factory and tool automation, real 300 mm strides remain elusive. And the debaters are lining up. Many feel 300 mm standardization efforts have caused tool prices to rise, while driving compatibility and integratability downward. Others point to the fact that almost every 300 mm fab still distributes notebooks filled with fab-specific tool specs. By addressing the standards, some ask, have we simply been unable to come up with reasonable tool designs that meet the needs of next-generation manufacturing, or are the standards themselves flawed?
机译:根据SEMI标准设计的300毫米设备能否解决未来的工厂挑战?还是会迫使行业转向其他解决方案,例如基于自动化集群的解决方案?尽管所有焦点都集中在300毫米上,但200毫米晶圆加工消亡的肿瘤却被大大夸大了。 200毫米行业非常活跃,并且可以满足行业需求。这远远超过了当今300毫米技术的说法。经过300多年积极的300 mm工具开发和100多个SEMI标准(几乎专门针对300 mm工厂和工具自动化),真正的300 mm步伐仍然难以捉摸。辩论者正在排队。许多人认为300毫米的标准化工作已导致工具价格上涨,同时使兼容性和可集成性下降。其他人指出,几乎每个300毫米晶圆厂仍在分发笔记本,这些笔记本中装有特定于晶圆的工具规格。有人问,通过解决这些标准,我们仅仅是无法提出满足下一代制造需求的合理工具设计,还是这些标准本身存在缺陷?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号