首页> 外文期刊>Security studies >Hatchet or Scalpel? Domestic Politics, International Threats, and US Military Spending Cuts,1950-2014
【24h】

Hatchet or Scalpel? Domestic Politics, International Threats, and US Military Spending Cuts,1950-2014

机译:斧头或手术刀?国内政治,国际威胁和美国军队支出削减,1950-2014

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Budgetary cuts are characterized by distinct political, organizational, and psychological dynamics in contrast to increases. Ideally, policymakers rank, prioritize, and assess among likely strategic challenges to identify the appropriate offices, programs, line items, or service branches in which to curtail spending. Targeted cuts-preserving some line items or services while cutting others-occurred during the Eisenhower, Kennedy, Ford, and Clinton administrations. In contrast, the Nixon, H.W. Bush, and Obama administrations implemented across-the-board cuts, impacting all areas of the budget uniformly, regardless of strategic priorities. We argue that the ability of the executive to target and redirect spending commensurate with national security needs are constrained by domestic interests. However, the degree to which the threat environment is diverse conditions the number of available policy options and, in turn, executive capacity to implement targeted cuts vis-a-vis parochial interests.
机译:预算削减的特点是与增加的政治,组织和心理动态不同。理想情况下,政策制定者的排名,优先考虑,并在可能的战略挑战中评估,以确定要削减支出的适当的办事处,计划,线项或服务分支机构。在艾森豪威尔,肯尼迪,福特和克林顿主管期间,在切割其他地区的削减某些线项或服务时削减一些线条物品或服务。相比之下,尼克松,H.W.布什和奥巴马主管部门在董事会中实施,均匀地影响预算的所有领域,无论战略优先事项如何。我们认为,执行委员会目标和重定向与国家安全需求相应的支出的能力受到国内利益的限制。但是,威胁环境是多样化的程度,条件是可用政策选择的数量,而且反过来,执行有针对性的削减识别额外兴趣的行政能力。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Security studies》 |2019年第4期|677-709|共33页
  • 作者单位

    Boston Univ Polit Sci Boston MA 02215 USA;

    Boston Univ Frederick S Pardee Sch Global Studies Boston MA 02215 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 21:26:27

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号