...
首页> 外文期刊>Securities Regulation Law Journal >Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.: Reliance on Deceptive Conduct and the Future of Securities Fraud Class Actions
【24h】

Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.: Reliance on Deceptive Conduct and the Future of Securities Fraud Class Actions

机译:Stoneridge Investment Partners诉Scientific-Atlanta,Inc .:对欺诈行为的依赖以及未来的证券欺诈集体诉讼

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This term, in an opinion authored by Justice Kennedy, a majority of the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court held, in Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., that purchasers of an issuer's securities could not bring a securities fraud class action against outside actors who allegedly engaged in deceptive conduct that inflated the value of the issuer's securities because plaintiffs could not show that they relied on defendants' actions. To rule otherwise, according to the Court, would extend the private securities fraud action beyond what Congress intended and what sound policy dictated.
机译:根据肯尼迪大法官(美国最高法院多数法官)在Stoneridge Investment Partners诉Scientific-Atlanta,Inc.案中的判决,该词表示发行人的证券购买者无法提起证券欺诈集体诉讼针对据称从事欺骗性行为而夸大发行人证券价值的外部参与者,因为原告无法表明他们依赖被告的行为。法院认为,若以其他方式裁定,将把私人证券欺诈行为的范围扩大到国会的意图和合理政策所规定的范围之外。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号