首页> 外文期刊>Securities Regulation Law Journal >The SEC: Preoccupied Watchdog?
【24h】

The SEC: Preoccupied Watchdog?

机译:SEC:专心监督?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As a corporate attorney focusing on securities regulation, my daily practice is affected by a constant and pervasive issue-the importance of investor protection under the federal securities laws-or at least there used to be. The passage of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBs Act, represents a significant diversion from the core principles of past securities legislation in the United States in that it reorders the Securities and Exchange Commission's, or the SEC's, stated mission to place, in certain cases, "facilitating capital formation" at the forefront and "protecting investors" in the rearview mirror. Such reordering creates an inherent conflict of interest for the SEC by now charging it with the responsibilities of protecting investors and stimulating the economy through regulation (or more appropriately, deregulation) and oversight-a role historically charged to, and better suited for, the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, via the regulation and oversight of tax incentives for America's emerging and growing businesses.
机译:作为专注于证券监管的公司律师,我的日常实践受到持续不断且普遍存在的问题(根据联邦证券法保护投资者的重要性)的影响,或者至少曾经如此。 2012年《快速启动我们的业务启动法案》(或《 JOBs法案》)的通过,大大偏离了美国以往证券立法的核心原则,因为它重新排列了证券交易委员会或SEC的陈述使命,在某些情况下,将“促进资本形成”放在最前沿,将“保护投资者”放在后视镜中。这种重新排序现在通过赋予证券交易委员会负责保护投资者和通过监管(或更恰当地是放松监管)和监督经济刺激的责任而产生了内在的利益冲突。美国国税局(IRS),通过对美国新兴和成长型企业的税收优惠进行监管和监督。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号