首页> 外文期刊>Scientometrics >The motivation for citing specific references by social scientists in Korea: The phenomenon of co-existing references
【24h】

The motivation for citing specific references by social scientists in Korea: The phenomenon of co-existing references

机译:引用韩国社会科学家的特定参考文献的动机:共存参考文献的现象

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study, based on the premise that references are a social product that reflects the social environment of a society, is an attempt to explore the co-existence of Korean and non-Korean literature in the references to Korean papers. 321 authors (papers) who published in 43 issues of 24 Korean journals focused on the social sciences were surveyed about their research channels and citation motivations, and the 11,358 references in the papers were analyzed. The findings were as follows : (1) The extent of the co-existence was that non-Korean literature was cited 1.9 times (65.3%) more often than Korean literature; (2) Research channel was the most common non-Korean channel orientation (55.8%); (3) The motivation for citations was significantly dependent on whether the literature cited was Korean or non-Korean. Non-Korean literature was chiefly cited for conceptual (20.7%), perfunctory (16.0%), and persuasive (15.1%) motivations; (4) The citations and citation motivations behind non-Korean literature were significantly influenced by research channel, discipline, focus of research, publishing career, and type of paper. Of these variables, research channel was frequently related to the citation of non-Korean literature. Finally, this study is very suggestive on two counts: (1) Citation motivation might constitute a new approach for exploring the production of knowledge by researchers. (2) This study has demonstrated, in particular, an empirical relationship between knowledge produced by Korean social scientists and non-Korean knowledge through the analysis of citation motivation.
机译:这项研究在前提是参考文献是反映社会社会环境的一种社会产品的前提下,试图在参考韩国论文时探索韩国文学与非韩国文学的共存。调查了321名在24种韩国社会科学期刊中发表43种期刊的作者(论文)的研究渠道和引文动机,并对其中的11358篇参考文献进行了分析。研究结果如下:(1)共存的程度是,非韩国文学被引用的频率比韩国文学高1.9倍(65.3%); (2)研究渠道是最常见的非韩语渠道定位(55.8%); (3)引用动机很大程度上取决于所引用的文献是韩国文学还是非韩国文学。主要引用非韩国文学的动机是概念性的(20.7%),敷衍的(16.0%)和有说服力的(15.1%)。 (4)非朝鲜文学背后的引文和引文动机受到研究渠道,学科,研究重点,出版事业和论文类型的显着影响。在这些变量中,研究渠道经常与非韩国文献的引用有关。最后,这项研究在两个方面很有启发性:(1)引用动机可能构成研究人员探索知识产生的新方法。 (2)通过引用动机分析,本研究特别证明了韩国社会科学家生产的知识与非韩国知识之间的经验关系。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Scientometrics》 |2004年第1期|79-93|共15页
  • 作者

    Kim Kapseon;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Library and Information Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 110-745, Korea;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号