...
首页> 外文期刊>Scientometrics >Climate change and interdisciplinarity: a co-citation analysis of IPCC Third Assessment Report
【24h】

Climate change and interdisciplinarity: a co-citation analysis of IPCC Third Assessment Report

机译:气候变化与学科交叉:IPCC第三次评估报告的共引分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study addresses whether interdisciplinarity is a prominent feature of climate research by means of a co-citation analysis of the IPCC Third Assessment Report. The debate on interdisciplinarity and bibliometric measures is reviewed to operationalize the contested notion of interdisciplinarity. The results, based on 6417 references of the 96 most frequently used journals, demonstrate that the IPCC assessment of climate change is best characterized by its multidisciplinarity where the physical, biological, bodily and societal dimensions are clearly separated. Although a few fields and journals integrate a wide variety of disciplines, integration occurs mainly between related disciplines (narrow interdisciplinarity) which indicate an overall disciplinary basis of climate research. It is concluded that interdisciplinarity is not a prominent feature of climate research. The significance of this finding is explored, given that the problem scope of climate change necessitates interdisciplinarity. Ways to promote interdisciplinarity are suggested by way of conclusion.
机译:这项研究通过对IPCC第三份评估报告的共同引用分析,来解决跨学科性是否是气候研究的突出特征。审查了关于跨学科和文献计量学的争论,以使有争议的跨学科概念得以实施。根据96个最常用期刊的6417篇参考文献得出的结果表明,IPCC对气候变化的评估最能体现其多学科性,即物理,生物学,身体和社会各方面均清晰分开。尽管一些领域和期刊整合了各种各样的学科,但是整合主要发生在相关学科之间(狭窄的学科交叉),这表明了气候研究的整体学科基础。结论是,跨学科性不是气候研究的突出特征。鉴于气候变化的问题范围需要跨学科性,因此探索了这一发现的意义。结论提出了促进跨学科性的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号