首页> 外文期刊>Scientometrics >'The Triple-Helix collaboration: Why do researchers collaborate with industry and the government? What are the factors that influence the perceived barriers?'
【24h】

'The Triple-Helix collaboration: Why do researchers collaborate with industry and the government? What are the factors that influence the perceived barriers?'

机译:“三重螺旋合作:研究人员为何与行业和政府合作?影响感知障碍的因素有哪些?”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper addresses four questions: What is the extent of the collaboration between the natural sciences and engineering researchers in Canadian universities and government agencies and industry? What are the determinants of this collaboration? Which factors explain the barriers to collaboration between the university, industry and government? Are there similarities and differences between the factors that explain collaboration and the barriers to collaboration? Based on a survey of 1554 researchers funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), the results of the multivariate regressions indicate that various factors explain the decision of whether or not to collaborate with industry and the government. The results also differed according to the studied fields. Overall, the results show that the variables that relate to the researcher's strategic positioning, to the set-up of s|rategic networks, to the costs related to the production of the transferred knowledge and transactions explain in large part the researcher's collaboration. The results of the linear regression pointed to various factors that affect collaboration with researchers: research budget, university localization, radicalness of research, degree of risk-taking culture and researcher's publications. Finally, the last part of the paper presents the results, and what they imply for future research and theory building.
机译:本文讨论了四个问题:加拿大大学与政府机构和行业的自然科学与工程研究人员之间的协作程度如何?这项合作的决定因素是什么?哪些因素解释了大学,企业和政府之间进行合作的障碍?解释合作的因素与合作的障碍之间是否有异同?根据加拿大自然科学与工程研究委员会(NSERC)资助的1554名研究人员的调查,多元回归的结果表明,多种因素解释了是否与行业和政府合作的决定。结果也因所研究的领域而不同。总体而言,结果表明,与研究者的战略定位,战略网络的建立,与转让的知识和交易的产生相关的成本有关的变量在很大程度上解释了研究者的合作。线性回归的结果指出了影响与研究人员合作的各种因素:研究预算,大学本地化,研究的激进程度,冒险文化的程度和研究人员的出版物。最后,本文的最后一部分介绍了结果以及它们对未来的研究和理论构建的意义。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Scientometrics》 |2007年第2期|301-332|共32页
  • 作者

    Omar Belkhodja; Rejean Landry;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号