首页> 外文期刊>Science >All For One And One For All
【24h】

All For One And One For All

机译:所有之一,我为人人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Few scientists win a Pulitzer Prize. In 1991, Bert Hoelldobler and Edward O. Wilson did for their magisterial The Ants (1). Now these distinguished collaborators offer The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance, and Strangeness of Insect Societies. In this ambitious book, they seemingly have three goals. Holldobler and Wilson reprise and update themes from The Ants while broadening their survey to include other social insects (most notably honeybees). In a thread woven throughout the narrative, they argue that colonies of social insects should be seen and studied as superorganisms, a naturally selected level of organization a step above individual organisms. And they present the work in a format apparently intended to attract the broadest possible readership of both specialists and nonspecialists. This suggests the authors' probable primary motivation-they are advocating a conceptual framework for understanding insect sociality that has been out of favor for four decades.
机译:很少有科学家获得普利策奖。 1991年,Bert Hoelldobler和Edward O. Wilson为他们的大法官The Ants(1)做过。现在,这些杰出的合作者提供了《超生物:昆虫社会的美丽,优雅和怪异》。在这本雄心勃勃的书中,他们似乎有三个目标。 Holldobler和Wilson重现并更新了The Ants的主题,同时扩大了他们的调查范围,以涵盖其他社交昆虫(最著名的是蜜蜂)。他们贯穿整个叙述,认为社会昆虫的殖民地应被视为和研究为超级生物,这是自然选择的组织水平,比单个生物高出一步。他们以一种显然旨在吸引专家和非专业人士尽可能广泛的读者的格式介绍作品。这表明作者可能是主要动机,他们正在提倡一个概念框架,以理解昆虫的社会性,这一框架已经失宠了四十年。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Science》 |2008年第5906期|1327|共1页
  • 作者

    James H. Hunt;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号